Chris Anderson Wrote > On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Sam Joseph wrote: > > > > If the key index is being updated with new keys and being restored in > > Freenet couldn't you be updating degrees of association of keywords with > > keys based on user feedback? > > > > e.g. utdqti3tro7qiet6atsql2iugakfyg Douglas (6), Adams (5), > > Hitch-Hikers(4) > > > > I mean effectively you would be storing what NeuroGrid stores > > efficiently in a relational database in a flat file, but you could still > > do it, no? > > > > How are you incorporating this feedback into the rank? Suppose I had > another key: > > utdqti3tro7qiet6atsql2iugakfyg2 Quincy (12), Adams (10), Bush (8) > > If my query contains the term Adams, it seems the relative weights of the > term associations are the same, but the absolute strength of the Quincy > hit is stronger.
Right, actually NeuroGrid uses a more complex ranking system where every
