On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 01:25:59PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > Unfortunately you didn't do a very good job. You have basically reinvented > a functionality we have had since last summer. I don't quite see how you > could have spent any time at all reading about or using Freenet without > running into signed keys (SSKs as we call them). > > The first thing you mention, using a hosts entry for proxy.freenet.local > rather than localhost for URLs is an interesting idea. Can users on Unix > systems set up their own hosts entries? Currently installing and running
Nope. All the DNS resolving stuff is controlled by root. -- GCS d s+:-- a--- C++++ UL++++ P L+++ E W++ N- o K- w-- O- M V- PS+ PE+ Y+ PGP+++ t 5 X R+ tv-- b+ DI+ D++ G e- h! r-- y-- pete at petertodd.ca http://retep.tripod.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010420/a8d2ef10/attachment.pgp>
