> > I really don't like the wording 'lite' and 'standard'. IMHO 'standard' > should be without Java and something > > like 'complete' for the Java including part. > > I must debate this one.
I agree 100% with Sebastian. Calling the distribution with the JRE included 'Standard' will cause people to download that version unnecessarily, wasting lots of bandwith in the process (the JRE is, what, ~5mb?). Why not Freenet 'stand alone' (or 'without Java') and 'with Java'? You could include some instructional text a la 'If unsure, download the version with Java'. Verbosity is our friend, here. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org
