OK - I've changed the naming convention *and* the htl default 'Freenet-nojava-setupn.n.n.n.exe' refers to Freenet installers version n.n.n.n *without java* 'Freenet-withjava-setupn.n.n.n.exe' refers to Freenet installers version n.n.n.n *with built-in java*.
The installer gen script 'freenet.nsi' run by itself produces a freenet installer without java The new script freenet-java.nsi defines a flag 'embedJava', then includes freenet.nsi, which results in a freenet installer with built-in java. BTW - I've committed an entire license-compliant Sun JRE tree into CVS, so anyone checking out the Contrib/wininstall tree will be self-sufficient and able to generate installers with java. Also, I've changed FProxy's default htl to 25, as per Oskar's suggestion. Lastly, I've committed Freenet-nojava-setup0.3.8.1.exe and Freenet-withjava-setup0.3.8.1.exe to the CVS tree. Until some admin moves these to the download area (or empowers me to do so), they are available for download via webcvs. They are also mirrored on my host as: http://nullmorte.cjb.net/Freenet-nojava-setup0.3.8.1.exe and http://nullmorte.cjb.net/Freenet-withjava-setup0.3.8.1.exe Cheers David ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Reich" <[email protected]> To: <devl at freenetproject.org> Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2001 11:15 AM Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Re: Windows distribution naming > > Windows installer with Java runtime (use this if you don't have Java) > > I'd suggest "Windows installer with Java runtime (use this if you don't have > Java or you're not sure if you do)" > > -Stefan > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Brandon" <blanu at uts.cc.utexas.edu> > To: <devl at freenetproject.org> > Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2001 1:10 AM > Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Re: Windows distribution naming > > > > > > > >From a programmer's or power user's point of view, James and Sebastion > are > > > totally right. > > > But from a marketing/PR point of view, I argue that the 'Standard/Lite' > > > convention makes more sense. > > > > > > I'd appreciate a ruling from the project admins on this one. > > > > I don't think we need to label them with these glib labels at all. > > > > The download section currently says this: > > Windows > > Windows installer (best option) > > Zip file > > > > In the future it should say: > > Windows > > Windows installer with Java runtime (use this if you don't have Java) > > Windows installer without Java runtime (use this if you're upgrading) > > Zip file (doesn't include Java runtime) > > > > If programmers are argueing over the meanings of Standard, Lite, and > > Complete, then users are bound to be confused as to which version they > > want. So it's best to just eschew labels and tell them which one they > want. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Devl mailing list > > Devl at freenetproject.org > > http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl > > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl > _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
