On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 10:40:10PM -0500, Brandon wrote: > I'm not dancing around the problem. Split files inherently suck. They suck > because the parts can fall out independently and what we want is for them > to all fall out at the same time. They also suck because the compromise > deniability. No one seems to have ideas as to how to solve either of these > problems. > > One solution is to find a way that you can request parts of a file but > still treat the file as an atomic unit rather than as a loose collection > of independent files. > > Although if you have a solution to these problems using normal split files > then I'd be interested to hear it.
IDA + selective caching -- # tavin cole # # "The process of scientific discovery is, in effect, # a continual flight from wonder." # - Albert Einstein _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl >From - Tue Apr 24 09:40:43 2001 Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org> Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11]) by funky.danky.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA02489 for <danello at danky.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 23:14:55 -0400 Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9BE6580DF; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 20:56:08 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: devl at freenetproject.org Received: from server5.generalmail.com (server5.fpw.ch [194.209.117.20]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 361575806A; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 20:55:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([194.209.117.3]) by server5.generalmail.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5 release 215 ID# 0-58584U1100L100S0V35) with ESMTP id com; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 05:12:05 +0200 Received: from tavin by localhost with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 14rtpx-0008JZ-00; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 23:50:01 -0400
