> Yeah, but Whiterose is always one version ahead, anyways. The point of > Whiterose is not to maintain Fred compatibility, but to be an endless > construction job.
And thus I am not worried that it won't keep up. :-) > B> This won't stop your node from breaking when 0.4 is released. > > Will anything? Basing it on libfreenet would make it as painless as possible as it frees you from over-the-wire protocol issues. You'd still have to update behaviour issues. The thing which kept 0.3 applications from ever recovering was the over-the-wire protocol issues. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl >From - Mon Apr 30 02:04:52 2001 Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org> Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11]) by funky.danky.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA24753 for <danello at danky.com>; Fri, 27 Apr 2001 13:51:16 -0400 Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE00581AB; Fri, 27 Apr 2001 11:32:10 -0700 (PDT)
