Dave Hooper wrote: >>I have never been told that (at least I can't recall it), so I never had >>the chance of fixing this. *Sigh*, how am I supposed to fix bugs if >>nobody reports them... >> > > Yeh, same here. Although I think I must've been using an out-of-date or > borked copy of MSDN when I wrote that bit of code, as it only listed > MsgWaitForMultipleObjectsEx (there was no MsgWaitForMultipleObjects in my > copy) and it said Msg....Ex was compatible with Win95. > Now using msdn.microsoft.com, which is pretty much guaranteed to be > definitive, which should stop me blundering like that again. > > Seb ... it appears that your 'fix' still uses MsgWaitForMultipleObjectsEx > ... ?
Mhh, I did convert the MsgWaitForMultipleObjectsEx to MsgWaitForMultipleObjects, I'll recheck and make sure that I actually commited the changes :-). BTW, Dave do you feel comfortable with us rewriting freenet.exe from scratch (on my 2002 ToDo list) to make it a clean MSVC app and not the homegrown mess that originally started with my assembler proof of concept code? Sebastian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 2301 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20011218/db2f21e4/attachment.bin>
