On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 07:04:55PM -0500, Mark J. Roberts wrote: > On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Chris Anderson wrote: > > > > > Will the node process redirects? > > > > > > No. > > > > I think the http-in-node will have to do redirects, so the functionality > > may have to be on the node side... > > Yes, but IIRC Oskar wants to leave redirect-following to the client. I > don't know if it's the best approach; I can see the argument for treating > FCP like HTTP and doing all the processing and redirecting beforehand. > Then again, I can also see the case for leaving that to the client > authors to preserve flexibility.
It was not me, I really don't care either way. I believe Adam advocated this model, and it does make some sense to leave the context browsing to the client itself - the control documents are in the same format as the FCP messages, there really is nothing very complicated about them. > > > -- > Mark Roberts > mjr at statesmean.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://www.uprizer.com/mailman/listinfo/devl -- 'DeCSS would be fine. Where is it?' 'Here,' Montag touched his head. 'Ah,' Granger smiled and nodded. Oskar Sandberg md98-osa at nada.kth.se _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://www.uprizer.com/mailman/listinfo/devl
