On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 07:04:55PM -0500, Mark J. Roberts wrote: > Yes, but IIRC Oskar wants to leave redirect-following to the client. I > don't know if it's the best approach; I can see the argument for treating > FCP like HTTP and doing all the processing and redirecting beforehand. > Then again, I can also see the case for leaving that to the client > authors to preserve flexibility.
The client follows redirects, not the node. I'll have a metadata standard (nothing really new, just documenting and cleaning up) sometime and the clients can work with that. I think that http-proxy code should be separate from the node (or at least segmented from the node). I think Matt Skinner is working on FCP-Python which can have a proxy put on it and then we have a node independant proxy. AGL _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://www.uprizer.com/mailman/listinfo/devl
