On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Ruediger Kapitza wrote:

> On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Ian Clarke wrote:
> 
> > Ok, Bad, can you do the deed - and then let the package developers know
> > where they can find the code so that they can create the various
> > packages.  I will update the mirrors as soon as this is done.
> > 
> > BTW - whatever happened to that .rpm release of Freenet?
> There was still a bug in the redhat-rpm but there was although a
> ENOTIME in/on my schedule this weekend so I decided to move it away
> until there is really working version. ( in about 2h ;-) 
> Right know I'm not really sure which branch to use for a new try or if I
> should download the src 0.3.7.1 tgz. ( think the stable branch 
> should be a good solution) 
> I'll drop a line when its ready for bug-reports.
Ready. http://wwwcip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/~rrkapitz
This is an rpm made from the current stable branch (2h ago). I expect that
the install works for SuSE (tested) and runs well for SuSE (quick tested).
I hope that the install works for Redhat. (Almost sure like the last three
times ;-) (not tested) and maybe runs. If the rc.script fails under Redhat
it should be a PATH issue. Take a quick look at
/etc/rc.d/init.d/freenet and adjust the PATH setting in the script to your 
needs. I have no glue where normally java is located under RH. (I tried
to ask this on irc 20 min ago but didn't get an answer.)  
Any response is welcome.
        Ruediger  


_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl at freenetproject.org
http://www.uprizer.com/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to