From: "David McNab" <[email protected]> > For you *nix-heads, why not try letting ht://dig loose on the Gateway. > That might be quite sufficient for search requirements.
An afterthought - it's a tad unwise to suggest that all users run ht://dig But it could be cool if one or more keen folks with big disks and fast connections run it, then make ht://dig's output available in-freenet. Then, a client-side ht://dig wouldn't have to download the whole damn freenet. It could simply download the latest server-side ht://dig output, and search *that*. Cheers David To: <devl at freenetproject.org> Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 18:11 Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy Searching > From: "Ian Clarke" <ian at hawk.freenetproject.org> > > >...let's have search in Freenet > <snip> > > I've been experimenting with spidering freesites, starting with the FProxy > Gateway page. > > Some of the commercial windows spidering appz, like WebReaper (and others > which don't frig '//' to '/') are actually doing a good job crawling > Snarfoo, PigDog etc. > > For you *nix-heads, why not try letting ht://dig loose on the Gateway. > That might be quite sufficient for search requirements. > > Bear in mind that ht://dig might have to be hacked a tad to allow for > Freenet's long response times. > No prob though - ht://dig is open source. > > Cheers > David > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl > _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
