On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 11:22:36PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> > Hmmm, Gnutella doesn't have URIs AFAIK?
> It should anyways. 

How can you have a "Universal Resource Indicator" when you can't locate
resources globally?

> > Certainly separate layers, I have no problem with that - but I see
> > little point in making them separate applications.
> What is a separate application? That is a distribution issue. What is
> important is that they are separate problems.

Ok, I guess it is down to whether they share code, whether they run in
the same runtime environment, and whether they are ever distributed
separately.

> > > Either way, I have been
> > > thinking for a while that we should at least experiment about this by
> > > making it a seperate application for Napster/Gnutella type filesharing.
> > Can you define what you mean by this?
> An application that works like Napster.

So a URI is actually a URL, and it just lets you find URLs?  Not sure
that there would be much point...

> > I see no reason to think that simulations are pointless, but I do agree
> > that we need to implement.  It is about time I did some coding again, so
> > I plan to get started on this over the next few days.  I have an
> > architecture in-mind, which will be suitable for whatever we decide to
> > do with it.
> 
> I feel a little bit of "feature creep" over that. IMHO We don't have
> searching with binary key closeness down well enough to go running off on
> tangents like this quite yet. If you do want to code it, I hope that you
> take my advice and keep it separate from the main code for now (obviously
> sharing classes is good).

Hey, "feature creep" are our middle names ;) It has been the intention
to implement searching for years (wow - I can say things like "for
years" in regard to Freenet development, that is scary), this isn't just
me suddently coming up with a new idea.

I have every intention of keeping it separate, although I definitely
still think that it belongs as part of Freenet (we could do a poll -
"Should freenet have fuzzy searching?" but that probably wouldn't be
fair).

Ian.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010603/64705ff1/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to