On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 09:24:29AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 10:48:10AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 08:44:44PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > > > I have noticed with recent CVS that FProxy is slow to return pages, and > > > sometimes it hangs for ages without returning an error message. Now it > > > may be something todo with my HTL 100, combined with QueryRestarted > > > messages coming from somewhere. I am getting suspicious that > > > QueryRestarted messages may not be such a hot idea. > > > > And what, may I ask, is the alternative? > > No query restarted message, and the message times out within a > constrained amount of time.
Using a TTL instead of a HTL is an option, but you still need to do something if you get no reply at all. Terminating the request completely works, but I don't see the advantage at all. What you should do is give some warning to the fproxy user when it happens, so that a user that doesn't want to wait can give up. > > I tend to think that using HTL 100 and then complaining about slow > > response is a little silly... > > I am not talking about just slow responses, I am talking about 3 hours > with no response. The wait time for queryrestarted with HTL 100 should be 20 minutes, so that is a lot of nodes that are eating your requests. -- 'DeCSS would be fine. Where is it?' 'Here,' Montag touched his head. 'Ah,' Granger smiled and nodded. Oskar Sandberg oskar at freenetproject.org _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
