On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 01:07:10PM -0500, thelema wrote: > I'm all for trying out things that could help the network, but I don't > like jumping in head first. Not to mention I'd imagine lots of people > aren't going to upgrade to this newest version, leaving us in a > situation with a mixed node behavior. I guess my response is that we > should proceed with some caution, as breaking the network isn't a good > idea.
Well, having mixed node behavior with respect to caching shouldn't break the network. I agree with your discomfort over jumping in head-first, although this shouldn't have a cataclysmic effect even if it doesn't work. > A very high priority should be getting a solid debian package out, as > there's _lots_ of people using the old one even with its problems. > RPMs for the non-debian users would be good as well, so if anyone has > RPM packaging experience, that'd be a great help. Agreed, Mr. Bad - could you check your .deb scripts and stuff into CVS so that others can create .debs, and use them for the basis of an rpm package? I would refrain from creating a 0.3.9.1 deb given the mapfile bug, but a 0.3.9.2 deb should follow that release shortly. Ian. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010606/93ebfdf7/attachment.pgp>
