On Wed, 06 Jun 2001, Mr.Bad wrote: > >>>>> "t" == thelema <thelema at mh246001.truman.edu> writes: > > t> from what I understood (this may not be the case), there was > t> just one debian package created around 0.3.8 or so. That build > t> had some problems, but we didn't find out about it 'till later. > t> So we got a decent number of people using a semi-broken node. > > Well, that's all absolutely wrong. > It's good that the record is now being set straight.
> * There have been about 8 Debian packages, and I've been keeping them > fairly up-to-date. They're in unstable, if you use Debian. I don't use debian, which is a big reason I had incorrect notions about the state of the debian packages. > > * The 0.3.8.1 release is pretty damn good. If it weren't for some > IndexClient stuff, we wouldn't have even done and 0.3.9. Originally, > everyone wanted 0.3.9 to be 0.3.8.2, because there's just not that > much difference. > if we have a stable debian release, I'm happy. > After I did the 0.3.9.1 release, I started working on the .deb, and I > had some noxious client problems. I've been trying to debug them, but > I haven't had too much time. I'm going to to try and put some time in > this week and get them figgered out. > Good luck. > ~Mr. Bad > Thelema -- E-mail: thelema314 at bigfoot.com If you love something, set it free. GPG 1536g/B9C5D1F7 fpr:075A A3F7 F70B 1397 345D A67E 70AA 820B A806 F95D -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010606/70b7a668/attachment.pgp>
