> > It has likely been tested very little, and has probably never been > > seriously debugged. Feel free.
FCP works pretty good for me. The only caveat is that key inserts sometimes fail. Putting retry code in the client fixes that - so far, 100% of files insert successfully within 3 attempts. I'd totally recommend FCP to any client programmer. The only pain is the metadata handling, which FCP doesn't do. But there are several FCP interfaces already written, for various languages. Hunt 'em down :) Cheers David ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gianni Johansson" <[email protected]> To: <devl at freenetproject.org> Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2001 15:46 Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Does FCPClient.java work? > On Saturday 16 June 2001 22:52, Tavin wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 10:20:55PM -0400, Gianni Johansson wrote: > > > Has anyone used FCPClient.java lately? > > > > > > Is it tested? > > > > > > I naively tried to switch Freenet.client.RequestClient over to FCP as a > > > quick smoke test like this: > > > > <snip> > > > > > Does anyone know what's up? > > > > It has likely been tested very little, and has probably never been > > seriously debugged. Feel free. > > ! > > Is FCP for real? From reading the list, I had the impression that it was the > becoming the preferred client protocol. > > Is the FCPHandler.java implementation tested at least? > > -- gj > > -- > Web page inside Freenet: > freenet:MSK at SSK@enI8YFo3gj8UVh-Au0HpKMftf6QQAgE/homepage// > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl > _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
