On Sunday 17 June 2001 03:11, Tavin wrote: > On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 11:46:41PM -0400, Gianni Johansson wrote: > > On Saturday 16 June 2001 22:52, Tavin wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 10:20:55PM -0400, Gianni Johansson wrote: > > > > Has anyone used FCPClient.java lately? > > > > > > > > Is it tested? > > > > > > > > I naively tried to switch Freenet.client.RequestClient over to FCP as > > > > a quick smoke test like this: > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > Does anyone know what's up? > > > > > > It has likely been tested very little, and has probably never been > > > seriously debugged. Feel free. > > > > ! > > > > Is FCP for real? From reading the list, I had the impression that it was > > the becoming the preferred client protocol. > > It's for real. It's just no one has been using the java impl. of the > FCP _client_. I mean, we have, what, 3 java clients? Yours, Mr. Bad's, > and the reference clients? And all 3 of those are still using FNP. > > > Is the FCPHandler.java implementation tested at least? > > It's fairly solid. As solid as it's going to get. The FCP interface > in 0.4 Fred will be quite robust. Ok, I will take a look at the FCPClient.java stuff and see what I can do to beat the bugs out. No promises on schedule though...
-- gj -- Web page inside Freenet: freenet:MSK at SSK@enI8YFo3gj8UVh-Au0HpKMftf6QQAgE/homepage// _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
