On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 06:28:10PM -0400, Tavin Cole wrote: > Thanks for doing the legwork on this, Bad. However, I think requiring > users to restart the node once a day to get new inform.php addresses, > or requiring them to maintain the nodes.config file, isn't what we > want in the long run. > > We need to modify the way the routing table works so that it doesn't > lead to "ubernode election" in the first place.
And, as I said in my original email, one promising avenue of investigation is limiting the number of references to a given node in the datastore. Assuming anything other than a tiny network, there is no good reason why multiple references to the same node must be tolerated. Ian. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010618/dea8e67c/attachment.pgp>
