On Friday 29 June 2001 19:01, Bad wrote:
> >>>>> "GJ" == Gianni Johansson <giannijohansson at mediaone.net> writes:

> I think the term you're looking for is "private network addresses."
> (e.g. 10.0.0.1 or 192.168.255.1).
Right. Thanks.
> ...

> I don't think it's that big a deal. The address should eventually
> disappear from real nodes, since it's not resolvable.
I disagree. Truly ridiculous addresses shouldn't make it into the data store  
(or whatever the 0.4 routing mechanism's analog is) in the first place.

$ grep "tcp/192.168.1.100:15487" .freenet/store_19114 | wc
     13      13     364   

Each one of these 13 entries may have displaced a real node reference that 
could have improved my node's routing.

--gj

-- 
Web page inside Freenet:
freenet:MSK at SSK@enI8YFo3gj8UVh-Au0HpKMftf6QQAgE/homepage//

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl at freenetproject.org
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to