> On that note, I checked in a version of fserve.c / fserve.exe and
flaunch.ini
> that should work with either jvm, so it will be possible to re-enable
> detection of jview/jview when the next installer gets made.

Is that so?
Can Freenet now work universally with windoze jview.exe?
Was it as simple as that?

** WAY COOL!! ** :))


----- Original Message -----
From: "Benjamin Coates" <[email protected]>
To: <devl at freenetproject.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 11:21 PM
Subject: RE: [freenet-devl] JRE License


> >From "David McNab" <david at rebirthing.co.nz>
> >Hmmm, I humbly confess I hadn't noticed the non-redistributability
clause.
> >
> >However, the with-java version remains the fastest, easiest and most
> >reliable way of getting Freenet up and running successfully on windoze. I
> >challenge anyone to come up with a better scheme.
>
> On that note, I checked in a version of fserve.c / fserve.exe and
flaunch.ini
> that should work with either jvm, so it will be possible to re-enable
> detection of jview/jview when the next installer gets made.  Note that it
is
> always located in %windir% (on 98/me) or %windir%\system32 (on NT/2000).
I
> still think it would be a good idea to have a with-java version available,
> unless the legal stuff (ick) makes that impossible.
>
> --
> Benjamin Coates
>
> p.s.  The windows packages of Sun's jxta demos consist mostly of a jar
file
> and a small .exe stub, which calls Microsoft's 'wjview' to run their
program.
> I'm not sure why Sun thinks it's a better idea to do that then
redistribute
> their own JRE, but if it's good enough for them...
>
> Also note that the fserve.exe I uploaded is rather larger than its
predecessor
> (about 32K).  This is because I compiled it with MSVC, which has an
> unfortunate habit of turning small sources into relatively large
executables.
> If anyone has a 'leaner' compiler, it would probably be a good idea to
> recompile it.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devl mailing list
> Devl at freenetproject.org
> http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
>


_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl at freenetproject.org
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
>From - Wed May  2 08:54:04 2001
Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org>
Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11])
        by funky.danky.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA07143
        for <danello at danky.com>; Wed, 2 May 2001 07:24:34 -0400
Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id DBB2058164; Wed,  2 May 2001 05:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: devl at freenetproject.org
Received: from server5.generalmail.com (server5.fpw.ch [194.209.117.20])
        by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E5115815E
        for <devl at freenetproject.org>; Wed,  2 May 2001 05:04:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([194.209.117.3]) by server5.generalmail.com
          (Post.Office MTA v3.5 release 215 ID# 0-58584U1100L100S0V35)
          with ESMTP id com for <devl at freenetproject.org>;
          Wed, 2 May 2001 13:21:13 +0200
Received: from tavin by localhost with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))

Reply via email to