On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 08:21:53PM -0500, Brandon wrote: > > > > Really, the only reason not to put the embed the metadata key is that it > > > will make CHKs longer. I don't see this as being a serious problem, or > > > even noticable at all. > > > > No, but then what is the difference between doing this and having one file? > > Well, as has been said many times, the difference is that files with the > same data part will have their data part collide on insertion, meaning
- [freenet-devl] no client me... Brandon
- [freenet-devl] no client me... Ian Clarke
- [freenet-devl] no client me... Brandon
- [freenet-devl] no client me... Ian Clarke
- [freenet-devl] no client me... toad
- [freenet-devl] no client me... da...@aminal.com
- [freenet-devl] no client me... Ian Clarke
- [freenet-devl] no client me... Oskar Sandberg
- [freenet-devl] no client me... da...@aminal.com
- [freenet-devl] no client me... Brandon
- [freenet-devl] no client me... da...@aminal.com
- [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHKs? Brandon
- [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHKs? Ian Clarke
- [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHK... Adam Langley
- [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4... Ian Clarke
- [freenet-devl] no client metadata in... Adam Langley
- [freenet-devl] no client metada... Oskar Sandberg
- [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHKs? Benjamin Coates
- [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHKs? da...@aminal.com
- [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHK... Scott Gregory Miller
- [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4... da...@aminal.com