On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 08:59:11PM +0100, Adam Langley wrote: > I really don't think that the FCP parsing times are too great - > certainly not compared to the network lag times. If people want > stunning performance they can use FCP or FNP. The cost of maintaining > all the different interfaces (in terms of time, bugs and > incompatibilites) is a lot. Better if FNP#2, FNP#3 (XML-RPC for wrose > maybe) and FProxy are in 1 proxy. Less node code - more shared code =
- [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #2 and beyond... Ian Clarke
- [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #2 and beyond... Steven Hazel
- [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #2 and beyond... David McNab
- [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #2 and beyond... Ian Clarke
- [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #2 and beyond... David McNab
- [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #2 and beyond... Brandon
- [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #2 and beyond... Ian Clarke
- [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #2 and beyond... Adam Langley
- [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #2 and beyond.... Ian Clarke
- [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #2 and bey... Adam Langley
- [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #2 and bey... Ian Clarke
