On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 06:29:42PM -0400, eigenman wrote:
> I agree with David.
>
> I would rather keep www.xxx.free instead of some enormously un-remeberable
> key.

Well, www.xxx.free just translates into the Freenet KSK "xxx", which will be
interpreted as "freenet:KSK at xxx" - which of these is more difficult for you
to
remember?

Ian.

Ok touche.  Although the dot protocol is still nice such as
xxx.yyy.zzz.free.

Jay Ferguson



_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl at freenetproject.org
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl

>From - Wed May 30 12:46:44 2001
X-UIDL: 3adbdd6c000006a1
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org>
Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11])
        by funky.danky.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA28762
        for <danello at danky.com>; Tue, 29 May 2001 18:55:26 -0400
Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id DE8825807D; Tue, 29 May 2001 16:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: devl at freenetproject.org
Received: by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix, from userid 500)
        id 019215803C; Tue, 29 May 2001 16:23:17 -0700 (PDT)
To: devl at freenetproject.org
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments
Message-ID: <20010529162317.E8317 at freenetproject.org>
References: <20010529225941.46697.qmail at web14701.mail.yahoo.com> 
<OE37GryWtIIZS2TRqf6000089e1 at hotmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wTWi5aaYRw9ix9vO"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i

Reply via email to