On Friday 09 November 2001 10:32 am, Timm Murray wrote: > > Qt would therefore be an ideal development platform for a freenet > > client. Qt is NOT GPLd though which may cause problems if you are > > also making use of GPLd software. > > Wait, you say it's ideal development platform for a Freenet client, > but then say Qt is NOT GPLd (for non-GNU/Linux platforms). Does this > strike anyone else as being wrong?
Qt is released under two licenses; it depends on whether you are creating commercial or free software. In this case, we/I are creating free software, therefore we may link to Qt on any platform GPL style. The website *is* a little confusing.. > Aren't there Windows/MacOS versions of GTK+/GDK/GLib? Perhaps. I like Qt because it provides the native-OS look-and-feel quite nicely from the screenshots I've seen on various platforms. -- Jay Oliveri "In the land of the blind, GnuPG ID: 0x5AA5DD54 the one-eyed man is king." _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
