Hi,
I've had another go at building freenet 0.4 into a windows exe which relies on
the windows jview jvm.
But to get it to compile, I had to make the following changes (simply inserting
'public'):
Freenet/node/State.java:37:
public final long id;
Freenet/transport/tcpTransport.java:12:
abstract public class tcpTransport implements Transport {
Freenet/node/states/data/DataState.java:11:
abstract public class DataState extends State {
How would people feel about these changes going in to the cvs code?
I still feel that the Visual Java-produced freenet.exe is still worth looking
into, since it seems to work far better with the windows jview.exe than did the
Sun-compiled jar file.
As for the Windows XP issue, where this new OS won't have jview?
My thoughts are, for now, fuck 'em.
It'll take quite a while for WinXP user base to get anywhere near the size of
the 98/NT/2k userbase.
By that time, Sun will likely have released their jview replacement.
Cheers
David
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010924/6c0dff25/attachment.html>
