On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 02:33:13PM -0500, Michael Wiktowy wrote:
> 
> > From: Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org>
> > Date: 19 Dec 2002 17:58:23 +0000
> > 
> > On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 09:39:00AM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > > "Um, no" to what?  There were a few suggestions in that paragraph.
> > No, we cannot make splitfiles transparent by default. Because the user
> > will not see ANY data transferred until we have a full segment with the
> > current FEC implementation.
> 
> <snip>
> > However, there is an option to not bring up the GUI for files below a
> > certain size.
> 
> But are there plans to have a &nogui URI flag to suppress the splitfile
> status page? This would be useful to freesite authors for largish inline
> file viewing of mime-types that the browser can handle. Then you can
> still have the status page available in the infolets for someone
> wondering what the state is.
I explained what we propose to do about inlines. If the request headers
look like it's expecting an image, it's probably an inline, so don't use
the GUI (if it's an unsafe type send the error anyway though).
> 
> It would also be nice if the default splitfile request parameters
> (initial hop/number of increments/increment size/splitfile threads)
> could be configurable. I find myself changing them everytime to
> 5/5/5/10.
Yeah, it's in the queue. Default should be 10/4/5/10.
> 
> -- 
> Mike
> 

-- 
Matthew Toseland
toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
amphibian at users.sourceforge.net
Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker.
Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/1/03
http://freenetproject.org/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021219/8d2f01f8/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to