On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 01:56:34PM +0100, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 06:55:26PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 02:42:12AM +0100, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > > > > Currently I have checked in the freenet-ext.jar file into the lib/ > > > > directory in the new "freenet" module. As for the suggestion above - I > > > > really don't care, although it seems like overkill. > > > > > > Why are you checking in binary files? > > > > Sheer unbridled shameless convenience. > > In what way is making everybody who wants to check out the freenet cvs > module wait on a large binary download a convenience?
It's a good point, Ian, although you might argue that it's only 100k. Another reason this isn't a good practice is because of something I'm doing right now: making some fixes to our junit code. Suppose I checked those in and then checked in a new unit test in the freenet tree that would break without those fixes. Since freenet-ext.jar will inevitably fail to track the current CVS sources it is generated from, you have a problem. -- :: tavin cole (tcole at espnow.com) :: _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
