On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 02:44:16AM +0100, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 03:57:13PM -0500, Tavin Cole wrote: > > <snip> > > > One java tree, one java tree, one java tree. > > > > So, should we also provide separate CVS modules called "javax" and > > "junit" for the servlet API and unit-testing stuff? > > They are not under development - there is no reason not to just move the > files into the tree.
My point is, what happens if there is a standard practice of making the CVS module correspond to the top-level package, as you are advocating, and there is more than one development project sharing the same top-level package name? Suppose you were developing free implementations of the servlet API (javax.servlet) and JSSE (javax.net, javax.net.ssl, javax.security) at the same time, for two different projects. -- :: tavin cole (tcole at espnow.com) :: _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
