On Wednesday 23 January 2002 05:35, you wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 07:05:36PM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote: > <> > > > Tavin, Oskar: > > I am really tired of arguing over the CP issue. > > <> > > Well, we aren't finished. It can stay your way for now (I still don't > have time to code so it is out of my hands) but the current system is > designed by trial and error additions of more and more arbitrary rules, > which is the absolute antithesis of how it should be if we want to keep > a shimmer of hope that Freenet's behavior can be understood and analyzed > (which is what really matters if we want things to work in the long > run). I find the claim that my code is incomprehensible to people smart enough to architect Freenet, less than credible. We could, and probably will (much later if ever,I hope) debate what you mean by "arbitrary". An arbitrary mathematical model with arbitrary constants is, well, arbitrary. I inherited code with just such a model. And it didn't work.
> If LRU is not a good way to order the Freenet routing table, we > need to establish another way, but this is not the way to do that. I don't know what you mean by this. Any outbound contact management system will override the routing over the short term. That's it's purpose. > I > don't feel any pressing need to start up the debate now (I didn't bring > it up) but the last word is far from stated. Groovy. -- Freesites (0.3) freenet:MSK at SSK@enI8YFo3gj8UVh-Au0HpKMftf6QQAgE/homepage// (0.4) freenet:SSK at npfV5XQijFkF6sXZvuO0o~kG4wEPAgM/homepage// _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
