On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 06:54:05PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 08:58:54PM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote: > > Are you saying that this is fixed? > > (Reported by Are) > > http://hawk.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/2002-January/010122.html > > (Confirmed by me) > > http://hawk.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/2002-January/010129.html > > No, just saw it - it is clear that datastores can still be corrupted when > the node is shut-down, this might be related to the fact that Freenet can > only be shut down by killing it (although clearly in an ideal world it would > be able to maintain datastore integrity regardless of when it is shut down). > It may simply prove too tall an order for the datastore to be 100% > resilliant to unexpected shutdown, I am not sure we should make this a > pre-condition to 0.5. Making a datastore resistant to corruption during shutdown is completely trivial if it was designed correctly. The previous datastore, despite its flaws at the application level, never had any trouble with this.
-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020124/3298c1e4/attachment.pgp>
