My node is doing over ten thousands qph now without breaking a sweat, so 
I'm fairly certain the problem is indeed fixed (though this is 
partially due to the fact that almost none are successful). 609 is a 
little better still since I reversed a conditional in 608 so it was 
still accepting bad announcements.

"maximumThreads" is the correct name for the setting. Please do not use
the 0.6 as the overload threshold - with 80 threads that leaves only 12
for the node to process requests and new connections, which is far too
little. The default value of 0.85 and 0.9 are good - changing those was
a typical example of going after the symptoms rather than the problem. 

I'm fairly confident that the new code is working as it should, and 
hopefully Matthew can do a new release with it sooner rather than later.

On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 07:20:30AM -0500, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
<> 
> From my end it looks good too.  Version 608 is the _first_ version since
> 525 that does not peg the cpu at 100%.  It still seems to use more than
> 525 but not too the extent that it stops doing useful work - the node is
> processing about 800 requests per hour (about 8400 jobs).  I am using the 
> following in freenet.conf:
> 
> maximumThreads=-80
> maxThreads=-80 
> doLoadBalance=yes
> overloadHigh=0.65
> overloadLow=0.60
> 
> I have seen both maximumThreads and maxThreads suggested on the list.
> Which is correct?
> 
> TIA
> Ed Tomlinson
> 
> 
> 

-- 

Oskar Sandberg
oskar at freenetproject.org

_______________________________________________
devl mailing list
devl at freenetproject.org
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to