On November 4, 2002 07:47 am, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > My node is doing over ten thousands qph now without breaking a sweat, so > I'm fairly certain the problem is indeed fixed (though this is > partially due to the fact that almost none are successful). 609 is a > little better still since I reversed a conditional in 608 so it was > still accepting bad announcements. > > "maximumThreads" is the correct name for the setting. Please do not use > the 0.6 as the overload threshold - with 80 threads that leaves only 12 > for the node to process requests and new connections, which is far too > little. The default value of 0.85 and 0.9 are good - changing those was > a typical example of going after the symptoms rather than the problem. > > I'm fairly confident that the new code is working as it should, and > hopefully Matthew can do a new release with it sooner rather than later.
Has something been reverted in 611? I seem to be back peged at 100%. Both 608 and 609 were ok - did not try 610. :-( Ed Tomlinson _______________________________________________ devl mailing list devl at freenetproject.org http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
