Matthew - What of the release builds do you think should be the minimum to run freenet? (from a technical/bugfixing/routing viewpoint)
Which Package? 0.5.0.5...etc... How about raising the Last Good Build to the build found in that package. Announce it to everyone a week ahead of time, post it on the website, in announce, support, devl, etc. Let's finally clear up some of the OLD FUCKING KNOWN BUGS!!! Some of which can definately use up valuable HTL as nodes try to route around old buggy nodes. Then, we'll see how routing does or doesn't improve, and we can discuss raising maxHTL from there... ----- Original Message ----- From: "fish" <[email protected]> To: <devl at freenetproject.org> Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 3:02 AM Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Getting rid of transient and ipaddress settings > > On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > The network may not be usable enough for it to be any use though (I do > > think we should consider raising the maxHTL a bit (35 say?) because of > > the network growth - but given the likely large number of pre-0.5.1 > > nodes out there, I'm not sure that we can...). I do agree with the > > principle that we should make it easier to deploy freenet nodes. > > honestly, if it improved the retrival probability significantly, I don't > think anyone would object to a mandatory at this juncture. Or maybe > people would, but you know, it'd make me happy :-p > > - fish > > > > _______________________________________________ > devl mailing list > devl at freenetproject.org > http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > > _______________________________________________ devl mailing list devl at freenetproject.org http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
