"Phil Marlowe" <fnmarlowe at hotmail.com> writes: > I say: > > Of course it's spammable, and that's a big problem with it. Anything > automated is probably spammable, given a sufficiently ingenuous > spammer. But anything that isn't automated won't scale well. > I agree that things requiring too much human effort aren't going to scale well, but I think that distributing load for finding (and especially approving of) content can work. Optimally this would be done by a freenet-browser; one in which you can bookmark keys. Those bookmark lists would be inserted into freenet, and would provide branching points for browsing. A tiny bit of annotation and the easy ability to link to other people's bookmark lists turns the whole system into a distributed TFE pre-arranged into various content categories by the likes of each user.
If I had the slightest inkling to write a GUI program, I'd go out and make this client a reality, but I dislike writing GUIs intensely, so I must rely on someone else to implement this idea. Thelema -- E-mail: thelema314 at bigfoot.com Raabu and Piisu GPG 1024D/36352AAB fpr:756D F615 B4F3 BFFC 02C7 84B7 D8D7 6ECE 3635 2AAB _______________________________________________ devl mailing list devl at freenetproject.org http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
