On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 03:42:39PM -0400, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> > > For PR purposes, we need to decide which day we will do the 0.5 release.
> We should not decide release deadlines based on PR concerns.

I am not deciding a release deadline based on PR concerns, I am deciding 
to have a release deadline based on PR concerns.

> We should do the release only after the code is stable.  The only way to know 
> the code is stable is to test it.

This is exactly what we have been doing for the last 15 days.

> I would suggest at a minimum, *after* the Windows installer is working 
> perfectly we freeze CVS, bump the minimum build number to force all 
> non-release candidate nodes off the network and test for at least one week. 
> Two would be better.  

The Windows installer is irrelevant, it has its own release schedule.

> There two things that I want to get in before a freeze:
> 0) Cleaner handling of undecodable splitfiles in the fproxy SplitFile 
> downloading ui.
> 1) Update the FEC code in freenet_ext.jar to use the onionnetworks 1.0.3 
> release which has full source for all support libraries.  The changes between 
> 1.0.2 and 1.0.3 are small.  The output should be bit-for-bit compatible so 
> this shouldn't be a disruptive change.
> 
> I should be done with these by the end of the weekend.

If they can be suitably tested by wednesday, then do it - if not, wait 
until 0.5.1.

> I wouldn't even consider making announcements to press until after we have 
> tested for at least a week.

We have been testing for the last 15 days.

> > Getting good PR coverage is essential,
> Hyping freenet is a bad idea.  When it works well people with tell other 
> people about it and the userbase will grow organically until journalists 
> start to call you.

Don't be dumb - more users means more testing and more donations.  More 
donations means that we can pay Matthew to work for longer, and that is 
good for the project.

> > as it will lead to wide
> > deployment and more donations
> !!!
> We should not be manipulating press coverage to make money.

That is the dumbest thing I have ever heard you say.

> Are we really short of money?  If so just put a request on the 
> freenetproject.org site asking for donations.  I would be surprised if 
> you didn't get whatever is nescessary.

We will, it will be part of the 0.5 release.

Ian.

-- 
Ian Clarke                ian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com]
Latest Project                                 http://cematics.com/kanzi
Personal Homepage                                       http://locut.us/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021019/146bbecd/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to