> Oh, bullshit. I argue for what I believe is right just like you do. The > reason that it is always you whose arguing on your own is that the rest > of us realize when our positions don't have any support - whether we > believe them right or not - and back away.
Wow - or perhaps the reason you always think that you have everyone else on your side is because you have a very selective memory with respect to who agrees with you and who doesn't. For example, in this debate, only Ed Tomlinson was 100% with you (and he barely participated), everyone else was somewhere between us - with GJ closer to you, and Matthew closer to me in my reckoning. It is quite telling that you assume that 20+ people are on your side, when in-reality only one person completely agreed with you, and only 7 people total even participated in the debate. Do you automatically assume that those that don't participate automatically agree with you? Who is inflating what now? > Trying to inflate your > stubborn inability to concede on a single issue into some sort of great > sacrifice is the most sanctimoniously ridiculous thing I have ever > heard. Assuming that everyone agrees with you when that is clearly not the case is the problem here Oskar, arguing against your "20 people agree with me so you should too" bullshit is not, particularly when it is patently not the case. Ian. -- Ian Clarke ian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com] Latest Project http://cematics.com/kanzi Personal Homepage http://locut.us/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021020/d8694b15/attachment.pgp>
