This is on 604, so there's no reason why it should be working perfectly, but there's two obvious issues:
1. Trying to access a DBR site that DNFs, will display the "The request followed a Date Based Redirect ... click here for an earlier dated version" message - but when it says "Technical details of this DBR: increment: 86400 offset:0" wouldn't it be better (for the user) to say something like "This earlier version is dated 00:00 October 30 2002". Actually this highlights another issue [1] 2. The example I tried was SSK at IuWJ~Zc7IZdfcCQHmHjp4-lBmksPAgM/RIAAsBane// . Clicking on the "earlier dated version" link takes me to "...?date=20021030-11:22:27. 11:22:27 is the local PC time, rather than anything to do with DBRs. - is there any reason it doesn't link to "...?date=20021030-00:00:00" instead? (Or is that not how the DBR offset is used?) [1] - Are there any plans (current or proposal) for localising FProxy? I expect this would increase the massmarket appeal of Freenet significantly (we've already had several support calls from non-English speakers requesting help and configuration instructions in their own language). Localising FProxy would not even be particularly difficult, just a simple string table lookup on all strings and external localised dictionary files, with presumably the American English dictionary coded into the .jar. I'd do it if I knew Java, but then it's so easy I doubt I'd even need to know Java to do it. Obviously there's then the issue of providing the translated strings. No biggie, that's what babel.altavista.com is for. d _______________________________________________ devl mailing list devl at freenetproject.org http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
