On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 12:51:47PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 11:44:52PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > > Just a rule of thumb - I suggest that we avoid upping the build number > > more than once a week. > I suggest we only up the version number when there is a change to the > externally (to the network) visible behaviour of the node, and we do > this as often as is necessary. This is 0.4, not 0.5. It doesn't work > properly and the priority is making it work properly.`
Duh. That doesn't change the fact that people have been updating the build (perhaps racing to get to the big five-oh-oh ;-) at a frantic pace of-late, and I am not sure that the frequent increments are justified. Ian. -- Ian Clarke ian at freenetproject.org Founder & Coordinator, The Freenet Project http://freenetproject.org/ Chief Technology Officer, Uprizer Inc. http://www.uprizer.com/ Personal Homepage http://locut.us/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020905/be5c8dab/attachment.pgp>
