On Fri, 13 Sep 2002, Travis Bemann wrote:
> > However, you were never able to insert a *site* by fproxy. This would be
> > a useful feature, no? :)
>
> The thing is that fproxy could NEVER actually insert whole sites into
> Freenet, and because site insertion is necessary to actually
> effectively publish content on Freenet, it is practically useless to
> keep the insertion feature in fproxy.
actully, inserting single files is often quite useful. There aer other
ways to advertise your keys than freesites, you know. What's more, people
*are* using these features. It's provable by the fact that they noticed
they went away!
- fish
_______________________________________________
devl mailing list
devl at freenetproject.org
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
