I didn't expect this to be so bumpy. I guess my error was in assuming that anyone else would do anything.
20020923 Announce intention to check in fixes to fproxy -- FEC inserting, non-local access restored. Ask if anyone objects. http://hawk.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/2002-September/001099.html 20020924 Checkin after receiving no objections Document changes and post to the list. Ask for help verifying/fixing the installers. http://hawk.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/2002-September/001106.html 20020925 Beg for help verifying the installers. http://hawk.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/2002-September/001123.html 20020926 Desperately beg for help verifying the installers. Check unix installer myself. Find that that it is not using freenet-ext.jar. Email ian, who fixes it. Though the actual process of how snapshots are built remains shrouded in mystery. http://hawk.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/2002-September/001127.html 20020928 As of today, *no one has bothered to email me or the list to report whether the windows installer works* It is really to bad if the Windows installer is broken. Is it still broken? I don't know. It should take 10 minutes to test and 10 minutes to fix and 10 minutes to rebuild if their is a problem. I don't have a windows machine so I can't do it myself. If someone had done this on the 25th there would be nothing to whine about. But I guess it's easier to whine and wait for someone else to do it. I wonder how much longer the Windows users will wait? --gj _______________________________________________ devl mailing list devl at freenetproject.org http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
