This appears only on port 8888, not 8889 or 8890 which appear correct. ----- Original Message ----- From: "SiliconZealot" <[email protected]> To: <devl at freenetproject.org> Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 1:00 PM Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] The development circus
> I got that same image a few days ago, and was hoping it was just a fluke. I > still have it there, was hoping someone else might see it before I tried > reinstalling to correct it. I update my snapshop daily, so is this a > compromised .jar issue? > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "fish" <fish at bovine.artificial-stupidity.net> > To: <devl at freenetproject.org> > Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 11:19 AM > Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] The development circus > > > > > > First, a disclaimer: I am completly pumped up on painkillers right now, > > so my spelling and grammer are NOT up to speed. be forwarned. > > > > updating an existing windows node: > > > > localhost:8888/ returns the standard IE warning blah blha ignore ignore (i > > don't have windows for any other reason than to build fishtools, so I'm > > not gonna waste more time by installing a browser. I'd actully never ever > > used fproxy on windows before today :-p). Then, for some bizzare reason > > gives not the usual freenet info screen, but rather something that looks > > like it came from that freenet art galery site - and it retrieved it over > > the network, no less - weird. > > > > Cleared my node, and it exhibits the same behaviour. > > > > Installing a new node: > > > > firstly, i accidently grabbed the wrong win32 installer from the snapshots > > page, and was might surprised when I saw the old fproxy intro screen - my > > bad :). But it's confusing.... the only *full* snapshot exe is from last > > febuary. No, I *don't* want a webinstall. really. > > > > uninstall that, install the webinstall, take my IE abuse again, look at > > the config, it's still asking me to put the nodestatusservlet on port > > 8890. okay that anyhow, just in case, start the node, wait ages and think > > that freenet isn't working, realise that it finally is and I just hadn't > > waited enough, take internet explorer abuse, and then the same > > image. I've attached it to this email. If anyone objects, they can all > > bite me. > > > > I tried inserting a onion1.2 FEC file, and that did work now with a stock > > install, so we can thank the good lords for small mercies. I fully intend > > to *only* support this format as of fishsite v3.0.9, which should be done > > sometime in the next 24 hours,not that it matters, since no-one uses my > > tools, but you know. > > > > I do not have win32 development tools other than mingw32 and python, and > > therefore I really cannot fix freenet. My internet bill (I am charged for > > data) is already high enough, and what's more, I've got my own bugs to fix > > :-p > > > > - fish > > > > On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, Gianni Johansson wrote: > > > > > I didn't expect this to be so bumpy. I guess my error was in assuming > that > > > anyone else would do anything. > > > > > > 20020923 > > > Announce intention to check in fixes to fproxy -- FEC inserting, > non-local > > > access restored. Ask if anyone objects. > > > http://hawk.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/2002-September/001099.html > > > > > > 20020924 > > > Checkin after receiving no objections Document changes and post to the > > > list. Ask for help verifying/fixing the installers. > > > http://hawk.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/2002-September/001106.html > > > > > > 20020925 > > > Beg for help verifying the installers. > > > http://hawk.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/2002-September/001123.html > > > > > > 20020926 > > > Desperately beg for help verifying the installers. Check unix installer > > > myself. Find that that it is not using freenet-ext.jar. Email ian, who > fixes > > > it. > > > > > > Though the actual process of how snapshots are built remains shrouded in > > > mystery. > > > > > > http://hawk.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/2002-September/001127.html > > > > > > 20020928 > > > As of today, *no one has bothered to email me or the list to report > whether > > > the windows installer works* > > > > > > It is really to bad if the Windows installer is broken. Is it still > broken? > > > I don't know. > > > > > > It should take 10 minutes to test and 10 minutes to fix and 10 minutes > to > > > rebuild if their is a problem. I don't have a windows machine so I > can't do > > > it myself. If someone had done this on the 25th there would be nothing > to > > > whine about. > > > > > > But I guess it's easier to whine and wait for someone else to do it. I > > > wonder how much longer the Windows users will wait? > > > > > > --gj > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > devl mailing list > > > devl at freenetproject.org > > > http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > devl mailing list > devl at freenetproject.org > http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > > _______________________________________________ devl mailing list devl at freenetproject.org http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
