> > While this is pretty much the best way to go from a paranoia standpoint,
it
> > seems to be the worst from a "people complaining that freenet is
useless"
> > standpoint. :)
>
> Why?

Because:
"* No CSS support. Hence CSS is blocked. Including inline style.
* ?date= links, and "?"'s in checked links, are blocked again (this will
  be fixed).
* No <base href> support, this might hurt a few hand-coded sites
* Plenty of other bugs and unfeatures :)"

At first glance one could be forgiven for thinking the new annonymity filter
will perform "too" well, to the extent that present (and future) freesites
are rendered unviewable. But as long as the "people" who are complaining
about freenet useability stay clear of the unstable branch (as well they
should) then I wouldn't expect too many complaints.  Unless the new filter
is in the regular branch too...

dave


_______________________________________________
devl mailing list
devl at freenetproject.org
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to