I think what was trying to say was the limitations of the first implementation of this new filter. Although CSS won't initially be supported I'm sure CSS support will be worked on. Am I right in thinking this?
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:devl-admin at freenetproject.org] On Behalf Of Dave Hooper Sent: 01 January 2003 23:21 To: devl at freenetproject.org Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] New Anonymity Filter > > While this is pretty much the best way to go from a paranoia standpoint, it > > seems to be the worst from a "people complaining that freenet is useless" > > standpoint. :) > > Why? Because: "* No CSS support. Hence CSS is blocked. Including inline style. * ?date= links, and "?"'s in checked links, are blocked again (this will be fixed). * No <base href> support, this might hurt a few hand-coded sites * Plenty of other bugs and unfeatures :)" At first glance one could be forgiven for thinking the new annonymity filter will perform "too" well, to the extent that present (and future) freesites are rendered unviewable. But as long as the "people" who are complaining about freenet useability stay clear of the unstable branch (as well they should) then I wouldn't expect too many complaints. Unless the new filter is in the regular branch too... dave _______________________________________________ devl mailing list devl at freenetproject.org http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl _______________________________________________ devl mailing list devl at freenetproject.org http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
