On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 11:08:28PM +0000, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 04:28:15PM -0600, Scott Miller wrote:
> > Remember though, guys, that UDP is unreliable, so you're going to need a
> > protocol for determining if your message was received, or you're going
> > to need a timeout. Freenet was designed to be protocol agnostic, but
> > its probably not tuned for lossy transports.
>
> The node already has lots of timeouts; I'm not sure that it would be a
> problem. Oskar concurs IIRC.
Yeah, but this is an entirely different case. In this case we may send
a UDP packet thats dropped somewhere on the Internet, but the node may
be there and a TCP connection would still have succeeded.
Scott
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030312/ac030dcf/attachment.pgp>
