On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 09:03:48PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> 
> I noticed something that's relevant to the earlier discussion about
> caching images and so forth.  It appears that even when mozilla
> caches the images, it doesn't *use* the cache if all the connections
> are used up.

Most annoying. Have you tried with Konqueror?
> 
> 20:48  greycat> Meanwhile, someone please explain THIS!: 
> http://wooledge.org/~greg/cachedimages.png
> 20:48  greycat> that logo *still* isn't loaded
> 20:49  toad_> greycat: explain what?
> 20:49  greycat> why isn't the imge loaded?
> 20:49  greycat> that key has already DNFed about 8 times
> 20:49  toad_> the rabbit icon?
> 20:50  greycat> yes
> 20:50  toad_> what happens when you right click open in new tab?
> 20:50  greycat> the rabbit isn't DNF'ing.  The CHK@ is DNF'ing, the rabbit is 
> supposed to be there already.
> 20:50  silent-fish> hrm
> 20:50  greycat> This relates to the mailing list discussions where you swore 
> up and down that all these images are supposed to be cached by the browser
> 20:50  silent-fish> that's the new error page that got sent to devl, right?
> 20:50  greycat> yes
> 20:51  toad_> but the rabbit isn't loadinbg
> 20:51  silent-fish> hrm
> 20:51  toad_> why isn't the rabbit loading?
> 20:51  greycat> and even with *one* image on it, it still sometimes fails to 
> load the images immediately
> 20:51  silent-fish> shouldn't the image icon be a broken image if it wasn't 
> there?
> 20:51  greycat> the rabbit loads very quickly once I stop TFE in the other tab
> 20:51  toad_> good point - it's still loading it?
> 20:51  toad_> greycat: DUHH!
> 20:52  toad_> so what are you complaining about?
> 20:52  greycat> why didn't mozilla load the image from its cache?  why did it 
> have to wait for a connection to the node to become available?
> 20:53  toad_> I don't know
> 20:53  toad_> have you disabled caching?
> 20:53  greycat> no
> 20:53  toad_> they SHOULD be cached...
> 20:53  toad_> we set an expiry date of 24 hours
> 20:53  greycat> now, the point is, multiply that by a hundred little tiny 
> images for the normal error page
> 20:53  toad_> no, that's BS
> 20:53  toad_> the image will be cached
> 20:54  greycat> and yes, I checked the headers the other day, the image/png 
> is sending out proper-looking headers
> 20:54  toad_> if the image is not cached, THAT is the problem
> 20:54  silent-fish> greycat: iirc, mozilla reads the cache in the network 
> retrieve part of the code, not in the part which calls the network retreive 
> part.  the network retrieve part only gets called n times per host etc etc etc
> 20:54  toad_> silent-fish: hrmm
> 20:54  greycat> in other words, cache lookups block waiting on network 
> lookups. Brilliant.
> 
> -- 
> Greg Wooledge                  |   "Truth belongs to everybody."
> greg at wooledge.org              |    - The Red Hot Chili Peppers
> http://wooledge.org/~greg/     |


_______________________________________________
devl mailing list
devl at freenetproject.org
http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to