On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 11:37:03PM +0000, Bob wrote:
> I'm fixing the wininstallers to match the new file
> setup on emu, but there are a couple of minor issues.
> 
> - freenet.exe isn't on emu yet, it's still on the SF
> snapshots and is pretty small but ideally it should
> be.
> 
> - seednodes.ref.zip on SF has seednodes.ref in the
> root where it should be, on emu it's in
> var/www/downloads/seednodes. There's presumably no
> good reason for this and it's breaking things.

It is more sensible for it to be in a separate directory. It allows us
to use a shorter update time for coral cache, apart from anything else.
What exactly is the problem with it not being in root?
> 
> The emu + coralcache combination is definetely better
> than sourceforge as might be expected, though I did
> get a file crawling at 1 kb/s the first time I tested
> it. The usual cancel-and-retry technique made it
> resume at ~130 kb/s. It might be worth pointing this
> out to the user :)
> 
> Bob
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20051126/a37d9d59/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to