On 22-Oct-2005 Matthew Toseland wrote: > There will have to be some arbitrary limits in the 0.7 metadata. > > Is a 256 byte limit on filenames reasonable? (We are talking about > names > in manifests or ZIP manifests here). Would it be better to use longer > filenames?
If you mean just for filenames, that should do, I would think. But if you're talking about complete pathnames, then no, I'd suggest at least doubling that figure. IMHO, of course. :-) -- Conrad J. Sabatier <conrads at cox.net> -- "In Unix veritas"
