On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 04:12:01PM -0500, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > > On 22-Oct-2005 Matthew Toseland wrote: > > There will have to be some arbitrary limits in the 0.7 metadata. > > > > Is a 256 byte limit on filenames reasonable? (We are talking about > > names > > in manifests or ZIP manifests here). Would it be better to use longer > > filenames? > > If you mean just for filenames, that should do, I would think. But if > you're talking about complete pathnames, then no, I'd suggest at least > doubling that figure.
Well, it's for *part* of the filename. Specifically, the bit that is fed to the manifest. > > IMHO, of course. :-) -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20051025/c39ce280/attachment.pgp>
