What port number should we use for FCPv2? I propose 9481. It does not seem to be used.
We can't use 8481, because we already use it for a different protocol (FCPv1). Well, we could... but it'd be nice if we made it easy for people to run both at once. It might be the best long-term option though. We can't use 8482, because Entropy uses it. 8483 doesn't seem to be used but is ugly. 8484 is used (HTTPS web calendaring or proxies or something?) 8488 is used. (KiLo trojan) 9491 and 9481 seem to be clear. Any comments? For now I'm going with 8483. -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20060217/867403aa/attachment.pgp>
