On 6/26/06, Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 10:02:16PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > > Matthew wrote: > > > I have no idea what you are talking about. > > > > Nodes that aren't worried about whoom they talk to can use destination > > sampling (like old Freenet, but with forced specialization). If nodes use > > this, it won't matter if they got in with some "matchmaking service". > > So opennet... Fix the node specialization, never swap it, and connect to > destination (with LRU). This will comfortably interface with darknet > swapping? What about nodes which have both darknet and opennet > references? The hybrid would be messy - half the network (well actually > 1% of the network) has location swapping and fixed links, and the other > half (99%) has fixed specialization and mobile links... and the nodes > which are on both have a few fixed links, a swappable location, and many > mobile links. > > This is sufficiently worrying that I'd have to see it simulated before > implementing it. And my gut feeling is that it will be considerably more > difficult in terms of load management and routing churn.
I really wish we could get people to not want opennet, it's just too much trouble for a more used but less tough net. > > > > // oskar > -- > Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org > Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ > ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFEoEDBOHFIJVywduQRAqfHAJ9Ag0eY3uEk8vc6KjHb3dFcIySJ9ACeOkrC > OXXgR+N2RWOTnLQpDmDeARM= > =mqvx > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > >
